It seems the last time I posted in either of my blogs was delineated in history as 2012. It is my hope that you dear reader have an open mind as to the question of my seriousness in all this. The seriousness and miraculousness if what has occurred in the earth timeline since that time. It is my understanding that in one translation the world as it was the world then, actually ended, and became a new world. Not in the usual way, which is every moment(___—_______——______), but in a bigger more “significant,” way. However, I must say I did not even notice it happening. Although looking back I might must raise the brows above my eyes and say wow, things-reality-meaning-value-the way things are do seem quite a bit changed. I will leave you to ponder this and perhaps we can pursue this “matter,” on down the line. Oh, ahem, I do know that my use of quotation marks on certain words is now considered archaic. I still happen to like that though. Just an old fashioned being. Please don’t sue. I am basically unmonied.
Museum of Stuff Redux
Sunday, July 31, 2022
Sunday, August 12, 2012
Lotus~Dodecahedral~Sacred Geometry Plate
Not one person I have shown this plate to, on first viewing, has been impressed. But then upon my urging a closer look, each has been thoroughly taken to wondering aloud and often for days, where on earth it might be from. What artisan or manufacturer could be capable of such finely detailed etching, or chasing? The intricate design is admittedly not "perfect." There are a few lines or dots in the wrong place. But the overall impression is, that whatever process was used, it must have taken hours and hours to complete the very ornate design.
Because it is hard to duplicate the rich metallic colors, I have photographed it on varied backgrounds. |
To the Egyptians, according to some experts, the lotus, symbolized by the 12-pointed star, represents rebirth.
The concept of rebirth arises again (oh, interesting choice of words "arises again") when one considers that the plate has a dodecahedral design. Perhaps this is but an accident of chasing and hammering, but I think not. The plate was certainly not meant to be flat. I'm thinking that the shape was significant to the maker of the plate. The dodecahedral shape symbolizes regeneration for diverse mystics, according to various sacred texts.
Actually, I did not understand all that I read and don't really understand how the plate might serve in any rituals. Perhaps it is something one could meditate on and realize some great truth, rather than being any actual instigator of regeneration. Or maybe it is one of those plates one passes around for congregants to place money in--an offering plate. Maybe it is a portal.... a plate with a secret that only the master of sacred geometry can decipher.
It dawned on me, that when turned over and held in soft light, it gives an impression of being a warmly glowing lotus.
From what I can determine, from my internet and reference book study, it would seem that the process of chasing and hammering was the one used to fashion this spherical plate. I don't believe it is a gong, as one of my friends suggested it might be. However, it is clearly not a plate to dine off of.
When it is flipped over, the extra- three-dimensional quality is readily apparent. And the design, which on the reverse (front) side of the plate might seem overly fine, almost cold in its adherence to the repetition, assumes a softened, faint, more graceful loveliness. And the burnished brass(?)bronze(?)copper (?)otherworldly metal(?) glows softly and almost pulses with a heartbeat, if one is overly imaginative.
It presents an optical illusion, the star-lotus shape is concave from the top and convex on the bottom. But when viewed from the top, it could appear to be the other way. |
Is this old? There seem to be no markings on it that would indicate its age or maker or where it was made. Maybe it is an heirloom or relic from our ancient Martian ancestors.
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Orange & Brown Soapstone Mushroom Man
Mushroom Man soaking up the sun |
He is a little scuffed up. |
Meditation is good for all that ails you, body and soul. |
A man of stone can easily take anything lying down. |
Nobody knows the trouble he's seen. Nobody knows where he's been.
I found him on a shelf in a second-hand store and he shone like a star amongst the banal crappola. He has a healing message .
UPDATE:
Silly me, ahem, apparently this mushroom man has something to do with psilocybin. I am not recommending psilocybin any more then I would recommend any other medicine, as I am not a doctor. But I would not say it's a terrible thing either. I really don't know. I don't think it is a good idea to do anything that is not legal, as it could land you in jail. But under the right circumstances, it seems psilocybin could be helpful in treating certain maladies. Check out this article published in a science journal in Jan 2012 (Yes, that is quite a while ago, but with all the economy and political stuff going on, I never noticed...maybe you didn't either.)
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/01/120123152043.htm http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/01/120123152043.htm
Friday, July 20, 2012
Venus Star Bowl
The bowl has a bronze(ish) patina on the outside and a polished golden inside.
|
Is this bowl from the 16th century, the 1960s, the '80s, or perchance, is it from the future? Is it a bath bowl? a medicinal bowl? A magic bowl? An alms bowl? Is it from India? Iraq? Iran? Pakistan?Afghanistan? Mexico? China? Some Greek island or some village perched on a Himalayan mountain?
Studying this repoussé brass bowl has taken me on a journey back through time--all the way to a consideration of the ancient goddesses and then through some other strange, meandering, circular terrain--In my research I viewed other similarly shaped bowls, but with the antithesis of design--meager lines and waves, rather than the rich and exotic wonders that embellish this bowl
There are myriad pictures of bowls in the Metropolitan Museum of Art that are somehow lacking, in comparison to this bowl. Those bowls do not have the deft charm that this bowl has. They do not have the stirring, mysterious piquancy that lingers into one's dreams, that this brass bowl has. ;-)
There are myriad pictures of bowls in the Metropolitan Museum of Art that are somehow lacking, in comparison to this bowl. Those bowls do not have the deft charm that this bowl has. They do not have the stirring, mysterious piquancy that lingers into one's dreams, that this brass bowl has. ;-)
The number 8 is mirrored from the star within the circle, to the waves of vines. There are four animals and four flowers. |
As a former philosophy professor, Pierre Grimes, used to say, “what do you know?”
Although I have examined it closely with my hands and eyes, under various lighting conditions. And I am intrigued by what I feel and see...
After all my research (and I must say here that my research, although relatively extensive, has not extended to consulting experts, nor has it included trips to university libraries), I have come to the conclusion that I don’t know much about this bowl.
Is this a lion? A lemur? A bear? It is the only animal facing forward. |
I know that the animals on the bowl are not animals that I am familiar with and they don’t resemble any animal figures decorating objects from anywhere that I have ever seen. But then, oddly, they do somehow look familiar. Do I know them from dreams? I note that only one animal seems to be viewing the viewer.
Of the four flowers placed between the animals, three are open and one is just beginning to bloom. (lower right corner). |
The script on the sides of the bowl might be Farsi. It might be Thuluth. Maybe it’s Indian. What does it say? I wish I knew. Is it nonsense, magic runes, prayers, or poetry? Or is it something more prosaic?
I found this bowl in a pile of dusty things that seemed to be the dregs of a garage sale that ended up at some thrift store. Was it my imagination that it seemed to call out to me? I felt shocked to find it in such a place.
Everything on the outside is in low relief on the golden inside. |
I seem to remember that when I took it to the cashier, she remarked that it was interesting, but very dirty. I took it home and washed it with a little mild detergent and began to seek answers. I haven’t found anything conclusive. But I will continue to keep my eyes and ears open. If you the reader, wish to offer any pertinent comments, I thank you.
In my wandering I did find one interesting website about Venus and many other interesting topics. I will include the link here.
Sunday, July 1, 2012
Ganesh Tea Pot?
This little pitcher (it measures four inches tall by six inches, from handle to spout), appears to me to have a rough resemblance to the great Hindu deity, Ganesha. Although his trunk is not curled, one could see why it would not make sense with his present duty as (water?) pitcher. The one other authority I questioned on this was not really an authority, he was only a person sitting near me when I decided to write about this.
As many of you will know, Ganesha was the child of Shiva and Parvati. There are so many stories about his birth and his attributes. But briefly stated, it isn't just the Hindus that love the guy. He is widely worshipped or at least admired by the Jains, some Buddhists and various other religions across the board. Most Christians don't acknowledge him, unless they happen to be the open-minded-lovers-of-all-mankind type of Christians. Or the Christian-Buddhist-Hindu type of Christians, Probably Thomas Merton would have been impressed with him. GGanesha Ganesa or Ganesh also known as Ganapti, Vinkaya Vināyaka), and Pillaiyar And other names as well is supposed to be an excellent remover of obstacles and will do wonders for the writing (I guess I better start putting flowers in this little pot.) He is also supposed to be good for knowledge and the arts. He has something to do with the first Chakra and the Kundalini.
Okay, that should be enough to whet your appetite, you study up on him if you like. And if by any chance you run into anything in your research that might shed light on this joyful expression of divine honor, do let us know. We here at the Museum of Stuff Redux are not too prideful to edit.
He thought that this pot wasn't Ganesha. He thought that this was just some ordinary pachyderm head. He thought Ganesha has a much fancier face. But I have interesting reasoning powers and so I have deduced that this is indeed a representative Ganesha watering pitcher, or maybe and more likely, a teapot. No average elephant would have those gold-edged, fan -shaped ears. And look at those wise eyes. Most elephants would not look at you like that.
At first, I thought this little pitcher/teapot was a cream pitcher. Then I noticed the spout has little holes. I thought maybe the little holes were more suitable to sprinkle water, maybe holy water? Or water for the special flowers to decorate somebody's shrine? Now I am thinking teapot. I really don't know yet. But I will keep researching.
I gave Ganesh the old tap with fingernails test and the ceramic body gives a lovely ringing sound. But it certainly isn't translucent when I hold it up to the light, so I guess that precludes porcelain and we might assume that it is some other type of ceramic, maybe simply white clay... For its size, it is very heavy, suitable for an elephant head.
There are no markings anywhere, so I can't be sure where it is originally from. But I would guess by the flower design on the forehead and by token of the fact that I believe it to be a depiction of Ganesha, this charming artifact is a former denizen of India. As mentioned previously, the body of the pitcher/teapot , is very heavy, as compared to modern such contrivances. Maybe the artisan was still
practicing his skill, or maybe that was the fashion at the time when this piece was made. It is sturdy!
Okay, that should be enough to whet your appetite, you study up on him if you like. And if by any chance you run into anything in your research that might shed light on this joyful expression of divine honor, do let us know. We here at the Museum of Stuff Redux are not too prideful to edit.
Wednesday, June 13, 2012
Very old and precious jade teapot
I am pretty sure that this is an ancient (or very old) white jade teapot. It is probably worth untold millions. I have seen that there have been a few jade teapots on the Christie's auction website that have sold for something like $1,695,000 And it would be really great if this teapot was worth that, or something anywhere near that :-). Once I showed it to a close relative, who shall remain unnamed, and she thought it was ugly. It isn't exactly graceful and delicate, not really a finely carved, complicated piece. But I find it to be beautiful. I bought it at a thrift store for $2.99. It was covered with tape. It was kind of like a grab bag. One could not make out exactly what it was, but I knew it was stone and I knew it was a little teapot, so I splurged. I took it into a local antique store and the owner was kind of busy with other customers, who were there actually interested in purchasing her wares. But she kindly had a look at it and said that she thought it was really jade. (Another time I showed her a necklace that I thought was jade and she sweetly let me know that it was a very nice soapstone necklace.) But when I showed her this teapot, she looked carefully at it and said that she thought it was jade. She seemed kind of uncomfortable and almost afraid and said she thought it might be very valuable. (Maybe she was trying to get rid of me)...But she gave me the phone number of a man who deals in Chinese antiques and his email. I emailed him and he responded to the query, telling me he was on his way to China and would return soon and to contact him again and we would arrange a meeting. Then I became excited. I had sent him photos and he wanted to meet. But then I began to think. I wondered if he just wanted to lure me into his dark shop, so that he could take my precious teapot. Or worse, he would charge me a fee to tell me it was a fake. I convinced myself that I shouldn't meet him, after all. That it could be dangerous or embarrassing. And the truth is, I really like the teapot. I don't want to sell it. I don't want to know if it's a fake. The teapot feels like it has been through time. It is mysterious. I wonder who carved it, who might have held it in his or her hands and if they ever had tea. Would it have been stained if it had been used for tea? Maybe jade is impervious to stain? I kind of love this tea pot, as much as you can "love" a thing. Maybe I only love it because of its mystery. If I found that it was not worth a great deal of money, I could go ahead and have a cup of tea and then I might love it even more :-) Unless there is some disturbing chemical like lead in the polish. Hmmm. Perhaps, I had better just use it for pondering. Or, I can hold it and imagine that if all else is lost, I can sell it to some very very very rich collector who will place it in a real museum where school children can learn about the history of everything, jade, carving, tea growing and preparation, the whole shebang...how tea makes everything good. YEAH, even though I have no pension, I do have my fortune in the form of a tea pot. Oh wow :-)
Friday, October 7, 2011
Someone's Sung
This poster or print that I found in a Goodwill in Cypress, CA has me perplexed. I thought it would be easy to research it and find out where it is from. I thought I could date it without months of digging through books at the library. I thought I would find similar images on the internet , no sweat. All that I have surely found is what an ignorant person I am and have been. I don't even know what country it is from. It might be China or it might be Korea or it might be chinoiserie from who knows where. I have studied several books on Chinese art and Japanese, Korean, etc. and have found that most Chinese and Japanese art have writing and seals on them, unless this is just a panel from a series or a scroll. It looks, from my admittedly truly-uneducated-in-Oriental-art-perspective to be from the Sung period. Or it is meant as a copy of something from the Sung period. BUT PLEASE, If you know better, PLEASE tell me what you think. I thought perhaps it could be a depiction of a scene from some Chinese opera, perhaps the one where a schoolgirl falls in love with someone in a dream. The people in the drawing don't look as if they live real lives. They don't look as if they need to walk around a lot. I believe the seated figure could be a man. Or the seated figure could be a woman. How truly disturbing that I don't know. I was thinking the seated figure could be a mother--due to the shape of her lower anatomy, I reasoned she might have given birth. Maybe this is a portrait of her and her eldest daughter. Or if that figure is a young rich man, could he be idle and too well fed and slightly out of shape? This is so embarrassing. I can't tell a man from a woman? I think both figures have grace and beauty. Obviously, they lead a genteel life, sitting around the garden. Why did the artist paint them? Was it simply because he or she was hired to do so by someone who wanted a portrait of family members ? Or was it a desire of the artist to show something he or she found .....what? beautiful? curious? somehow meaningful? All I could find from the label on the back of the frame is that the company made brass lamps and was involved in a lawsuit with some importers from Korea and another company from China. They don't seem to exist anymore, although I think they won that lawsuit. There doesn't seem to be a signature. There is a butterfly on the upper left border. I've included a photo of that (third photo down), as a clue for any interested viewer.
I humbly thank you for reading this and if you have any comments.....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)